>
> Can you direct me to the patch by name or location so I can grab it and
> download it? Thanks!
>
> "DL" wrote:
>
>> The version of Works installed requires an update/patch in order that the
>> Office upgrade recognises it - its a recognised problem/bug
>>
>> "David H." <DavidH[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:0FBCE4D8-A0DB-4CCA-B806-760A66BFE0E5[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> >I should have been clearer. I simply want to install Office Standard on
>> >a
>> > computer that did not have any version of Office -- just Works, which I
>> > was
>> > told was a qualifying product that allowed for installation of Office
>> > Stanard. Hope this helps.
>> >
>> > "David H." wrote:
>> >
>> >> Not sure what version, but the computer is only two months old so
>> >> whatever
>> >> version of works came with the Dell Inspiron with Vista would be the
>> >> Works
>> >> version.
>> >>
>> >> "Mary Sauer" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Works 9?
>> >> > Error message when you try to upgrade Works 9 or Works SE 9 to an
>> >> > upgrade
>> >> > version of a 2007 Office suite
>> >> >
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943290>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Mary Sauer
>> >> >
http://msauer.mvps.org/>> >> >
>> >> > "David H." <David H.[ at ]discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> > news:5F1D0968-9EA9-4A74-9A62-2B5C6A2C94CF[ at ]microsoft.com...
>> >> > >I went back to the Geek Squad at Best Buy to get Microsoft Office
>> >> > >for
>> >> > >Vista,
>> >> > > where I bought my new Dell laptop with Vista and Microsoft Works.
>> >> > > They said
>> >> > > that Works was a qualifying product that would permit the upgrade
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > Office
>> >> > > Standard 2007, which they pulled off the shelf and assured me was
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > correct
>> >> > > version. I typed the product key in correctly, but a message said
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > installation manager could not find any eligible products resident
>> >> > > on
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > computer to use the Office Standard 2007for Vista. Who is the
>> >> > > geek
>> >> > > in this
>> >> > > situation?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>>
>>
>>