> actually there were mentions in previous trek about the single engine
> design..
>
> there are 2 coils in the single nacelle. the federation had some early
> ships and experimental craft with 1.
>
> I read about this after seeing the kelvin and remembering that Rodenberry
> had said that you need them in pairs to achieve warp speed.
>
> The fact that JJ abrams is not a trek fan, and more of a star wars fan is
> scary... I would never put a director that is not a die hard trekkie (not
> a trekker) in charge of a Star Trek film! Not even george lucas!
>
> "Jonathan Kay [MVP]" <msnewsreplies[ at ]jonathankay.com> wrote in message
> news:ut3VErWaJHA.4072[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why thank you :)
>>
>> It's alright I suppose, the nacelles certainly don't do much for me - but
>> I can accept it. I'm trying to remain open minded about the film, but
>> that's slowly starting to fade more as they release more materials about
>> the film.
>>
>> The Kelvin is more a question mark for me. Nevermind the possible
>> problems with known trek physics and how these engines are supposed to
>> work, but it just looks like some mutilated federation design.
>>
>> Well, five months and we find out!
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Kay
>> Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger
>> MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger
>> MessengerGeek Blog:
http://www.messengergeek.com>> Messenger Resources:
http://messenger.jonathankay.com>> (c) 2008 Jonathan Kay - If redistributing, you must include this
>> signature or citation
>> --
>>
>>
>> "vista is bad for ya" <vista[ at ]microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:495789c8$1[ at ]newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>> Oh I love your star trek Christmas tree!
>>>
>>> What is your opinion about the new star trek 11 enterprise design?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My opinion about it is>
>>> Reminds me of vista.... (and that's not a compliment if you know what I
>>> mean! lol)
>>> Things changed around just to be different with no good reason...the
>>> result is a fugly craft that doesn't deserve the name Enterprise
>>>
>>>
>>> "Jonathan Kay [MVP]" <msnewsreplies[ at ]jonathankay.com> wrote in message
>>> news:emJ0YPKaJHA.4852[ at ]TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> One day it'll show up elsewhere I would expect...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jonathan Kay
>>>> Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger
>>>> MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger
>>>> MessengerGeek Blog:
http://www.messengergeek.com>>>> Messenger Resources:
http://messenger.jonathankay.com>>>> (c) 2008 Jonathan Kay - If redistributing, you must include this
>>>> signature or citation
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Stephen" <stephenseebaran[ at ]hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:085CA116-22D5-426A-AB99-E5C6CE76AB30[ at ]microsoft.com...
>>>>> Was this left for dead?
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://messidog.live.com/>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> An error has occurred.
>>>>> There's a problem with the Windows Live Web Messenger service right
>>>>> now. Please try signing in again later. If you have a different
>>>>> account, you may want to try signing in with that one.
>>>>> Help - Sign in with a different account
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> MSN Web Messenger still works but both links seem hush-hush. Is MS not
>>>>> interested in making WLM web accessible? I see brand confusion here...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - Stephen
>>>>
>>>>
>>